Swalwell argues Trump could have stopped the attack
Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., laid out the framework for how Trump, in the days after the election continued to falsely tell his supporters the election was "rigged" and "stolen," using a series of Trump's own tweets and remarks to make his point.
"Just like to build a fire, it doesn't just start with the flames, Donald Trump for months and months assembled the tend, the kindling, threw on logs for fuel to have his supporters believe that the only way their victory would be lost was if it was stolen. That way, President Trump was ready if he lost the election to light the match," Swalwell said.
Swalwell went on to remind how some election officials across the country were berated in the weeks following the election and played video of protesters surrounding the secretary of state's house in Michigan.
"There is plenty of evidence to show words have consequences -- and if he wanted to stop it, he could stop it," Swalwell said. "President Trump was never shy about using his platforms to try and stop something. He could have very easily told his supporters, stop threatening officials, stop GOP going to their homes, stop it with the threats. But each time he didn't."
Swalwell said Trump did the "polar opposite" of what anyone else in that chamber would have done had they lost an election. He started running ads falsely claiming election fraud and spent $50 million from his legal defense fund to amplify his message, Swalwell said.

"These ads were designed to run all the way up to Jan. 5, and then, they stopped. This was purposeful and deliberate planning to target his base to rally around that day. And it wasn't just his ads. He continued to use his own platform. He told his supporters who truly believed their victory had been stolen and who were ready to fight when, where and how to stop what he believed was a steal," Swalwell said.






