Congress used budget process to push back on Trump administration cuts to science
Despite the Trump administration's goal of defunding key science agencies, departments and programs that are playing a critical role in monitoring weather, climate and space, Congress has largely pushed back on that effort and provided significant funding through the end of the fiscal year.
Budgets for NASA, the National Science Foundation and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) passed with bipartisan support as Congress largely rejected the steep cuts proposed in the Trump administration.
Despite the Congressional pushback, President Trump signed the legislation after the White House expressed support for the financial package, saying it "avoids a bloated omnibus package and adheres to a fiscally responsible topline agreement that decreases overall discretionary spending.”
Sen. Patty Murray, D‑Wash., vice chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and ranking member of the Energy and Water Development Subcommittee, said in a statement, "We rejected Trump's plan to slash the funding for scientific research and the National Science Foundation's budget by 57 percent, [cut] NASA's science budget in half, and devastate NOAA and climate research that all of us rely on for accurate weather forecasting—whether we know it or not!”
NOAA, for example, saw its funding remain nearly the same as FY 2025, at $6.17 billion, compared to just under $6.18 billion. That's about $1.67 billion above President Trump's request, which had proposed cutting the agency's budget by about 25 percent.

The funding also addresses staffing concerns at local National Weather Service (NWS) offices, providing additional funding to help them reach full staffing levels, including a $10 million increase to the NWS's primary mission of analyzing, forecasting, and supporting meteorological activities.
The Trump administration's proposed budget called for eliminating NOAA's research division, the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR), and for significant reductions to other key offices, including the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), the world's largest provider of weather and climate data. OAR leads NOAA's weather and climate research and develops many of the forecasting tools meteorologists rely on to produce timely and accurate forecasts.
The cuts would have shut down NOAA's nationwide network of research labs and cooperative institutes, including the Global Systems Laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, where the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model, a critical tool in modern weather forecasting, was first developed more than a decade ago. The HRRR model helps meteorologists track everything from severe thunderstorms and extreme rainfall to wildfire smoke.
The Global Monitoring Laboratory, also based in Boulder, is another NOAA research lab that would have been affected. It oversees operations at Mauna Loa Observatory on Hawaii's Big Island, which has maintained the world's longest continuous observation of atmospheric carbon dioxide and has been crucial to understanding how human-caused greenhouse gas emissions fuel global warming.
While Congress rejected eliminating NOAA's Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, it approved the administration's recommendation to move three major weather research programs, including the U.S. Weather Research Program (USWRP), from OAR to the National Weather Service. The USWRP is an interagency federal initiative aimed at advancing research to improve forecasts for severe weather and other high‑impact events.
- ABC News meteorologist Dan Peck







