No ruling yet on TRO for evidence preservation
A federal judge did not rule from the bench on Monday on whether to dissolve a temporary restraining order requiring the Trump administration to preserve evidence related to the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti.
During the hearing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Friedrich Siekert reiterated the government's position that the TRO should be dissolved because lawyers representing the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) had no proof that the government is not preserving evidence related to Saturday's shooting.
"The intention of the federal government and all the agencies is to preserve this evidence until the conclusion of all federal matters," Siekert said.
In a declaration previously filed in court, an unnamed FBI official who was at the scene of the shooting said that in the immediate aftermath of the incident they adhered to a 12-step process of collecting/preserving evidence, but that due to the scene becoming volatile with protesters, that process "was adapted for the safety of personnel."

When asked by the judge to explain what adaptations were made, Siekert said he did not know.
Minnesota Assistant Attorney General Peter Farrell argued on behalf of BCA and said the state agency had "serious concerns" that the government would not be able to conduct a thorough and transparent investigation, claiming that they had reason to believe there has already been "potential spoliation" of evidence.
Farrell hinted that the photos shared of the gun allegedly owned by Pretti showed that federal law enforcement officials were not preserving evidence in the same way that state investigators might.

-ABC News' Armando Garcia






