After more than seven hours and two technical glitches, the second round of questioning for Barrett’s confirmation hearings has concluded.

Chairman Graham said he "lost sleep" over the hearing, but he ultimately thanked Democrats for conducting themselves in a way, Graham says, that is "befitting of the Senate" before offering some words of encouragement to Trump's nominee.

"You’re one of the most amazing human beings I’ve met in my life, and that’s saying a lot because I’ve met a lot of incredible people," Graham told Barrett. "With Amy Barrett, the best is yet to come."

Referring to Justice Ginsburg, Graham told Barrett, "She has a different philosophy than you do judicially. That is OK."

"I hope it’s OK that you can be pro-life and adhere to you faith and still be considered by your citizens worthy on the job."

Perhaps knowing that Republicans have the votes to confirm Barrett, Democrats did not ask for a third round of questioning. Instead, committee members will move forward with the next step in the nomination process, a closed-door session to review Barrett's FBI background check immediately following the hearing.

"You can have two glasses of wine tonight if you’d like," Graham joked, repeating, the hearing part is over."

Vice-presidential nominee Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., asked Barrett whether she agrees with the majority opinion written by Chief Justice Roberts in Shelby County v. Holder stating that voter discrimination still exists -- but Barrett wouldn’t answer what Harris said she thought was an easy question.

"Senator Harris, I will not comment on what any justice said, an opinion, whether an opinion is right or wrong, and endorse that proposition," Barrett said.

"So, do you call it a proposition or fact? Are you saying you cannot agree with the fact?" Harris pressed.

"Senator, I'm not exactly sure what you're getting at with asking me to endorse the fact or whether any particular practice constitutes voter discrimination. I'm very happy to say that I think racial discrimination still exists in the United States, and I think we've seen evidence of that this summer," Barrett said.

"These are very charged issues that have been litigated in the courts, and so I will not engage on that question," she added, when Harris continued on voter and racial discrimination.

Dissatisfied with her response, Harris pivoted to science and climate change and, after a series of simple questions including whether she believes in COVID-19, asked Barrett if she believes climate change is real.

"You have asked me a series of questions like that are completely uncontroversial like whether COVID-19 is infectious, whether smoking causes cancer, and then trying to analogize that to eliciting an opinion from me that is a very contentious matter of public debate, and I will not do that," Barrett said.

She didn't offer the information, but Barrett has previously disclosed she was diagnosed with COVID-19 over the summer.

Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., said he was disappointed when Barrett told him she had not read any studies or articles, books, law review articles or commentary regarding racial disparities present in our criminal justice system.

Barrett eventually said her knowledge of these issues roiling the country comes from conversations at Notre Dame.

"I would say what I have learned about it has mostly been in conversations with people at Notre Dame. As at many different universities it’s a topic of conversation in classrooms, but it's not something that I can say yes I've done research on this and read," she said.

Following questioning from Booker, Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho gave Barrett a chance to defend herself from the "implication" that she would "not be sensitive to the need for equal justice for all."

Barrett reaffirmed that she "abhors" racial discrimination and said she would want all of her children, "especially Vivian and John Peter" -- her two adopted children -- to know that she "unequivocally condemns racism."

-ABC News’ Trish Turner and Allie Pecorin

The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her legacy is a major presence at the confirmation hearing.

Both Republicans and Democrats have invoked the late justice in their questioning -- but her presence was shown in more visual ways, too.

For the third day in a row, Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, sported a mask with images of the late icon.

Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., had placed a photo of Ginsburg in front of him for his questioning.

Not far outside the committee room on Capitol Hill, people for and against Barrett’s nomination protested outside the Supreme Court building, with many holding signs nodding to her signature collar.

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., raised Barrett's dissent in a case she dealt with on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Kanter v. Barr, in which she suggested the Constitution protects the right of non-violent felons to own guns but does not protect their right to vote -- a right she wrote belongs "only to virtuous citizens."

"Here is what it boils down to," Durbin said, laying out his case. "After Heller, after the decision, after Scalia's statement, you concluded that any felony can take away your right to vote, but only a violent felony can take away your right to purchase an AK-47."

"Senator, with respect, that is distorting my position," Barrett interrupted. "What I said in the case, which is what Heller said and which is conventional in all discussions of this, to my knowledge, is that the right to vote is fundamental. However, it is an individual, fundamental right we possess, but we possess it as part of our civic responsibility for the common good."

"It is a distortion of the case that I ever said that voting is a second-class right," she added.

Durbin pressed forward, hoping to get a new answer from Barrett, but she held her ground.

"When you finished with your dissent here’s what it came down to say, if you are guilty of a felony that is not violent, you can lose your right to vote. You can't lose your right to buy a gun. Am I wrong?"

"Senator, Kantor had nothing to do with the right to vote. The point I was making in that passage, the 14th Amendment actually expressly allows for states to deprive felons the right to vote. And my point was there is no similar language in the Second Amendment," she began.

"I don't have an opinion and have never expressed one about the scope of a legislature’s authority to take away felon voting rights. What I said is there is a history of provisions and state constitutions and the federal Constitution, but I did not intend and if my words communicated that, this is a miscommunication. I never denigrated the right to vote," she said.

To which Durbin replied, "It was, at best, a serious miscommunication."

In another line of questioning, Durbin pressed Barrett on why she won’t say whether a president can unilaterally delay an election and she reiterated that she won’t discuss “legal hypotheticals” whether they are "easy or hard" questions.