Cross examination of prosecution expert gets heated
Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney Kevin Reddington attempted to push back on Monday against a prosecution expert who has testified that, in his opinion, the Massachusetts mother did not appear to be affected by postpartum psychosis when she killed her three children.
Forensic psychiatrist Avram Mack, whom prosecutors first called to the witness stand Friday, has at times refused to answer Reddington's questions during the defense's cross examination, and Judge William Sullivan has intervened multiple times.
"It's your understanding from reviewing her medical records that Lindsay never indicated that she was not participating in reality, that she was in a disassociated state, that she was out of touch with reality -- you're telling this jury you never saw that?" Reddington asked.
"I don't see that as a sign, strictly speaking, of psychosis, Mack said. "It may have been in some cases, but I don't see any signs of psychosis or delusions."
After a heated back-and-forth concerning how postpartum psychosis might manifest in some patients, Mack asked, "Are you referring to postpartum psychosis and illness? Or the findings of psychosis and somebody's postpartum?"
Reddington returned a sharp rebuttal.
"I'm asking you about Lindsay Clancy... the young lady that is sitting right here that you're testifying against in front of this jury that she is responsible for the death of her children,” answered Reddington.
Prosecutors are now re-directing Mack.




